I arrived in Kodiak, Alaska, two days ago with research technician Kali McKee. We are about to join scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory aboard the R/V Dyson for a two-week cruise. Our colleagues will be working on long-term monitoring of the ocean’s physics and chemistry and identifying larval fish in this important fishery. The target of our two-person team from Lamont is much tinier: plankton!
The word “plankton” comes from the Latin term for “wanderer.” They are the microscopic plants and animals in the ocean that form the base of all marine food webs. Most plankton are unable to swim, so they drift wherever the currents take them. Phytoplankton harness energy from the sun and “fix” it into carbon. They play a fundamental role in the carbon cycle, as well as in the cycling of oxygen (one of the by-products of photosynthesis), and various nutrients (e.g. nitrogen, phosphorus) in the world’s ocean. It is estimated that about 50 percent of the oxygen in the air that we breathe originated from phytoplankton! The way in which these tiny plants sink out of the surface ocean after they’ve reach high numbers represents a large removal of carbon that could otherwise return to the Earth’s atmosphere, and it makes sense that a lot of research is currently investigating the dynamics of these fascinating creatures.
Our goal in the Bering Sea is to see how much phytoplankton is here, and how the timing of the spring bloom is tied to the retreat of sea ice. Since 1997, the sea-ice coverage in the southeastern Bering Sea has been significantly reduced, due to warmer winter air temperatures. The downstream effect seems to be later phytoplankton blooms in years where little to no sea ice remains as the ocean warms in the spring. On top of that, the types of phytoplankton in those blooms appear to be different than in cooler years. Together, the timing of the spring phytoplankton blooms and the types of phytoplankton present can have significant effects on carbon cycling (which is important for understanding further climate change) and the food web. Zooplankton are the animal-like plankton which feed on phytoplankton and are themselves then eaten by everything ranging from fish to crabs to whales! As Discovery Channel fans know, the Bering Sea supports one of the world’s most productive fisheries, accounting for more than 50 percent of U.S. fish and shellfish catches. The goal of our study is to understand how climate change is impacting phytoplankton, and ultimately the Bering Sea ecosystem.
To understand these dynamics, we will spend the next two weeks taking water samples and looking at how much and what types of phytoplankton are present. We have a number of tools to help us make those determinations, and I will introduce you to some of those gadgets as we cruise along.
In the meantime, it has been a busy two days and a little rest is in order. The flights from New York took about 16 hours in total, and we have been busy setting up and securing loads of equipment (it can get rough out here!), conferring with our colleagues, and enjoying the phenomenal weather and long days in the 49th state. I spotted several of our national birds, the majestic bald eagle, while running errands in Kodiak, and this afternoon many happy sea otters lolled on their backs as we made our way through Kupreanof Strait. Whales, birds, and more fine weather hopefully await us, as do the plankton and the Bering Sea.
(unless otherwise noted, all photos: B. Stauffer)
Excellent work! I look forward to hearing more. Are there phytoplankton samples from before 1997, when ice levels were greater, so that you can compare for differences? Keep up the amazing work and incredible photos.
Hi Patrick. Thank you for reading, and this is a great question! It is hard to make meaningful conclusions about past changes or predictions for future change without some baselines. The group from PMEL that we are working with out here have actually been studying the area we are in since the early 1980’s, and there are publications on phytoplankton communities in the Bering Sea from the 1970’s as well. Year to year variability in our own data will help determine the differences in warm v. cold years, while comparisons to those older datasets will also allow for some greater understanding of how the ecosystem as a whole is changing.
Very interesting. Thanks for sharing.
Good luck! We will be reading every word!
Helga
AWESOME!!!
Fascinating work Beth, very interesting.
Hi Beth, How exciting! Looks interesting. God’s Blessings on your project.
Thank you for checking us out, Lois! It is an exciting trip and so far very productive! We have so far lucked out with decent weather and are keeping our fingers crossed for calm seas and lots of plankton in the next week and a half.
As Patrick said it would be very interesting comparing older samples. I would also speculate that this also correlates to the biodiversity of all the native fish species in the area. As a kayak fisherman this is very important to us because we can’t travel the distances normal anglers in a power boat can. Thanks and keep up the great work!
Thank you for reading! Yes, comparisons to older datasets are very valuable! I am actually rather new to this project and will have to investigate further what data is already out there once I can access Columbia University’s massive library and scientific journal holdings. In the meantime, yes, the amount and types of phytoplankton that make up the community here are highly likely to have important impacts on the biodiversity of important local fish species. Understanding those relationships are one of the key goals of both our and our NOAA colleagues’ projects.
This reminds me of when I went fishing with a few of my colleges. We just got brand new fly tying supplies and that made things a lot easier for us. Thanks for sharing this article. Great insights 🙂