State of the Planet

News from the Columbia Climate School


What’s in Your Rice? A Look at Where Rice in the U.S. Comes from

By Racine Nassau (SEAS ’13) and Jessica Neafie (DEES ’12)

In the USA, about seven percent of rice is imported while the rest is grown within the country. The average American consumes about nine kilograms of rice per year, and from 2001 to 2009 the USA used on average about 5.5 million tonnes per year (FAO, 2011). Eating rice is a staple for many people all over the world, and it is extremely water intensive in the production stages. Water scarcity is becoming a major problem all over the world and since this could impact food security, countries are examining their ability to grow crops and whether they should choose to import them instead.

Maintenance of water flows through virtual water is one way that countries can control their water problems, and rice, a major staple food that is consumed all over the world, is a major consumer of water.

Farmers transplant rice in Punjab, India.

Virtual water is the water that a country obtains through the goods that they import, so that a country faced with severe water shortages could import their most water intensive goods and instead produce goods that would not tax their water supplies as heavily. The major producers of rice in the world are China, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar, Philippines, Brazil, Japan, USA, Pakistan, and the Republic of Korea (in this order).

These countries make up about 3.5 percent of the rice imports into the United States. The amount of influence of these countries on US rice consumption will be examined by looking at US rice trade, the water footprint of the major rice producers, and the environmental impact of one producer over another.

US rice production dominates our consumption at over 90 percent, and the question is whether or not that choice is the best one for our water and our environment.

The US produces rice in Louisiana, California, Texas, Arkansas, and Mississippi throughout regions that could encounter water shortages by 2050 that would impede rice production. Knowing the alternative producers, and examining the environmental and economic efficiency is a requirement for future rice production (particularly if no alternative to reduce the water footprint is achievable).

The water footprint from each country’s rice production changes depending on the climate and irrigation system in that country. The following graph shows the water footprint (m3/t) in the major rice producing countries (Chapagain, 2011):

methane emissions from rice production in different countries
Methane Emissions due to Rice Production for Major Rice Producing Countries

Vietnam has the smallest water footprint which is roughly half of the U.S. footprint. Japan, South Korea, and China also have smaller water footprints than the U.S., but the U.S. water footprint is still below average when compared to all of the major rice producing countries. Favorable options for rice production could be further examined by looking at the water scarcity in the region and the means of production, then examining whether producing rice in this area is the most economically and environmentally efficient.

One area closely linked to the environmental efficiency of rice is not just the water use but the amount of greenhouse gases produced through production and imports. Although water could potentially be saved by importing rice from countries with smaller water footprints per unit rice produced, when factoring in greenhouse gas emissions this does not necessarily make importing rice the most environmentally friendly choice. Flooded rice fields are a significant source of atmospheric methane, a greenhouse gas which, according to the EPA, is approximately 20 times more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide, which has important implications for global warming. The following graph shows the median emission rate of methane for irrigated rice from some of the major rice producing countries (Sass 401).

Methane emissions and water footprint per unit rice for seven of the major rice producing countries.

The U.S. has relatively low methane emission rates for rice production, so importing rice from somewhere like Indonesia or Thailand could not only increase the water footprint, but also increase the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the rice we eat. Transportation of rice to the U.S. results in roughly an additional 2000-2500 kg carbon dioxide per ton rice, if the rice is imported by cargo ship from Asia to New York (Food Miles Calculator).

The following graph shows the methane emissions and water footprint per unit rice side by side for seven of the major rice producing countries.

The only country of the seven compared above that has a better methane and water footprint than the U.S. is South Korea. However, we import very little rice from South Korea (FAO 2011), and the carbon emissions associated with transporting their rice to the U.S. would likely make South Korean rice less environmentally friendly for U.S. consumption than American grown rice.

Due to climate change, pollution, and population increases, the world is seeing its access to fresh water diminish more and more every year. A resource that has been long overlooked because we saw it as renewable, access to freshwater is now a source of concern. Understanding virtual water is an important tool for finding solutions to growing water shortages and scarcity issues. But there is opposition to the idea of using virtual water as a solution: one because staple goods like rice are a much needed commodity and countries are becoming increasingly conscious of their food security; two the prices of goods; and three the carbon footprint produced from the transportation and production of these goods.

Banner featuring a collage of extreme heat images.

Recent record-breaking heat waves have affected communities across the world. The Extreme Heat Workshop will bring together researchers and practitioners to advance the state of knowledge, identify community needs, and develop a framework for evaluating risks with a focus on climate justice. Register by June 15

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 years ago

Yeah, about the RICE grown here in US, I will NEVER buy it if it’s from here as this country has to have it’s hands in everything and then genetically modify or put their GMO’s and poisons in all our foods. I was quite surprised to find that we do grow rice here in US. I only buy RICE imported from Thailand (Jasmine Rice). The US is always trying to undermine or take over every country and their resources etc., and I am so sick of it.

Laura McKenzie
Laura McKenzie
Reply to  Angie
3 years ago

The thing is, some countries use human waste to fertilize their rice. My son saw a video that India’s rice is not nutritious because the land is poor – also rivers have dried up because they cut down the trees. I prefer food grown in our country (USA) even tho I don’t like GMO. Several states grow rice. I’m way more scared of foreign foods – you just can’t tell how it’s grown

Jordan Way
Jordan Way
Reply to  Laura McKenzie
5 months ago

We have the highest amount of arsenic lvls in rice . Please reconsider your decision

7 months ago

I don’t trust products grown in China. If they aren’t contaminated by something, then they are bottom shelf of what they produced.